Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00501
Original file (PD2013 00501.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   CASE: PD1300501
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20131127
SEPARATION DATE: 20070527


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (92F/Petroleum Supply Specialist) medically separated for low back pain (LBP). The CI reported that her back pain started in 2003 after receiving an epidural block injection delivering a child. The condition, which was treated conservatively (electronic stimulation, physical and chiropractic therapy, etc), could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or physical fitness standards so she was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic refractory low back pain…,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded three other conditions (see rating chart below) for PEB adjudication. The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain…” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI wrote only “none at this time” in Block 3 of her DD-294 application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that her case may eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of any mental health (MH) condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnoses were changed or eliminated during that process. Since the CI responded to this mailing, it is presumed that she has elected review by the PDBR for the MH condition, although she did not specifically contend for it on the DD Form 294. In accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of mental health diagnoses that were changed during the Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, the applicant’s case file was reviewed regarding diagnosis change, fitness determination, and rating of unfitting MH diagnoses in accordance with the VASRD §4.129 and §4.130. The CI is also eligible for PDBR review of other conditions evaluated by the PEB and has elected review by the PDBR. The rating for the unfitting low back condition and any MH conditions are addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service PEB – Dated 20070405
 VA - (3 Days Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5299-5237 10% Chronic Low Back Pain with Disk Disease 5237 10% 20070530
Chronic Bilateral Hip Pain
 Not Unfitting Right Hip Pain 5099-5024 10%
Left Hip Pain 5099-5024 10%
Chronic Low-Grade de Quervain’s Tenosynovitis De Quervain Tenosynovitis, Bilateral Wrists 5024 0%
Chronic Intermittent Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain 7699-7629 0%
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 5
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70919 ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Condition. At the narrative summary exam on 27 November 2006, the CI reported a constant LBP with possible radiation to the hips. She noted an inability to comfortably run, jump, march or do sit-ups. The examiner noted that an evaluation by a spine specialist identified no surgical indication. Physical examination showed no evidence of non-physiologic pain. Straight leg raise testing for radiculopathy was negative and lower extremity strength was normal. Lumbar X-rays were normal, and a magnetic resonance imaging study 2006 showed “very minor disk disease” at L3 through S1. An orthopedist examiner on 8 January 2007 indicated that the pain was localized to the lumbar midline and did not radiate. There was no associated lower extremity numbness, tingling or weakness. Examination noted that lumbar flexion brought fingertips to twelve inches from the floor, and extension was approximately 30 degrees. There was no scoliosis or muscle tenderness, and muscle tone was normal. Pain at extreme extension was reported. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 3 days after separation, the CI reported daily LBP. “Pins and needles” sensation radiated to the hip area. “One episode of incapacitation” reportedly occurred in 2005, but details were not provided. Examination revealed a normal gait and spinal contour. Repetitive range-of-motion (ROM) showed no additional functional loss. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.


Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)
 MEB ~6 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P 3 days Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal)
 75 (73 70 75) 75
Extension (30)
 25 (24 21 23) 20
R Lat Flexion (30)
 25 (26 25 26) 25
L Lat Flexion (30)
 20 (21 20 22) 20
R Rotation (30)
 15 (16 17 16) 30
L Rotation (30)
 10 (14 17 12) 25
Combined (240)
 170 195
Comment
 +tenderness; no spasm No tenderness, spasm or guarding
§4.71a Rating
 10% 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA each assigned a 10% rating under the 5237 code (lumbosacral strain; analogously by the PEB). Board members agreed that the service and VA exams justified a 10% rating based on limitation of flexion and limitation of combined ROM. The Board also considered whether a higher rating could be achieved under the formula for rating intervertebral disc disease based on incapacitating episodes. However, the minimum rating under that formula was not met. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the low back pain condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. As previously elaborated, it is presumed that the CI has elected review by the PDBR for a MH condition, although she did not specifically contend for one on the DD Form 294. A record review shows that on the MEB physical (DD Form 2807), the CI wrote that she “worried about the next day” when she was experiencing trouble sleeping, and worried “about my soldiers and how their lives and family are.” However, careful review of the entire service treatment record found no MH diagnosis in evidence. The Board determined therefore that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process, and thus this applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. The Board likewise determined that there was no indication from the record that any MH condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a determination of unfit for any MH condition; and, therefore, no additional disability rating can be recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of any contended MH condition, the Board unanimously recommends no additional disability rating. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Low Back Pain 5299-5237 10%
COMBINED
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130513, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20140003609 (PD201300501)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00288

    Original file (PD-2013-00288.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20061114 No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic back pain without neuralgic abnormality” and “left Achilles tendonitis without ratable limitation of motion,” rated 10% and 0% respectively.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00088

    Original file (PD2012-00088.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSGT/E-6 (98C30/Research, Development, Test and Evaluation NCO), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) and right hip pain. The orthopedic examination performed on 14 February 2006, ROM was consistent with the MEB NARSUM examination and also indicated absence of tenderness or muscle spasm that would support a 10% rating using the general rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01324

    Original file (PD-2013-01324.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate Service disability rating for each of the pain problems. After a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that a separation disability rating of 10% was appropriate for the LBP condition. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02501

    Original file (PD-2014-02501.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Examination of the back was reported as normal and the examiner stated he could not ascribe any physical diagnosis or attribute any physical impairment to the LBP complaint.The Board first considered whether the back pain condition was unfitting when considered separately from the hip pain condition.Although the back and hip pain were somewhat intermingled in treatment records, orthopedic examiners described back pain separately from hip pain and indicated some impairment due to back pain. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01040

    Original file (PD-2013-01040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI is also eligible for PDBR review of other conditions evaluated by the PEB and has elected review by the PDBR.The rating for the unfitting chronic low back condition is addressed below. The major depression diagnosis was not forwarded by the MEB or adjudicated by the PEB; therefore the Board determined that this applicant did appear to meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.The Board next considered whether any mental condition, regardless of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00343

    Original file (PD 2014 00343.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic low back and hip pain condition, characterized as “Chronic low back and hip pain,”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back and hip pain”as unfitting, rated 10%with likely application of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39and VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The rating for the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01855

    Original file (PD-2014-01855.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PEB rated the chronic neck pain 0%, coded 5237 (cervical strain) and the VA rated it 20%.The Board considered that the CI was noted to have painful, mildly limited cervical ROM without noted muscle spasm at the MEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01974

    Original file (PD2012 01974.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Left Hip Pain . However, a specialist did diagnose a soft tissue LBP condition 1 October 2002 as separate from the left hip pain The Board agreed that based on the evidence in the record both the left hip and LBP conditions were reasonably considered to be separately unfitting conditions at the time of separation. Chronic left hip pain condition: the VA rated the left hip pain condition as 8529 (neuropathy, external cutaneous nerve of the thigh) at 10%.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01610

    Original file (PD-2013-01610.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I have contacted Evans Army Medical Facility to have my records forwarded to the Physical Disability Board of Review. While ROM limitations may have progressed over the 3-month time period, there is no evidence in the record from which to conclude that the severity near service separation approached that portrayed by the VA measurements.Board members agreed that the MEB examination revealed non-compensable limitation of motion, but evidence of degenerative arthritis was present to justify...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01211

    Original file (PD2013 01211.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20030511Based on VA and Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain, Without Neurologic Abnormality5299-529510%Chronic LBP w/DDD523710%STR & 20040818Muscle Atrophy Right Thigh and Right Leg, Etiology UndeterminedNot UnfittingRight Lower Extremity Atrophy….w/LBP w/DDD852110%STROther x 1 (Within Scope)Depression/Insomnia9499-9434NSC*STROther x 4 NSC Combined: 10%Combined: 20%*Derived from VA Rating Decision...